Marie Antoinette Online
  • FORUM
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:47 pm



Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
 One theory about their conjugal visits 
Author Message
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:45 pm
Posts: 944
Location: Hungary
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Saoirse wrote:
I don't think it matters which era you're from, that's really unfair and sad. :(


I think it was the only way they could do, whatever hard and troublesome it was. In those ages, in case of a royale couple it was normal doing their conjugal duties as soon as possible, though it sounds terrible. Otherwise of course I can agree with you, thier conjugal task was really mindless and cruel at their age...

_________________
"Ceux qui n'ont pas vécu avant 1789, ne connaissent pas la douceur de vivre" Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord


Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:37 pm
Profile
Duc/Duchesse
Duc/Duchesse
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:45 pm
Posts: 186
Location: Germany
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
I agree, dear anouk :biggrin:

reine :angel6:


Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:34 am
Profile
Marquis/Marquise
Marquis/Marquise
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:14 am
Posts: 98
Location: Colorado
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Marija Vera wrote:
ShaktiValkyrie wrote:
Yes, I would agree. It's sad though, that's how one of my closets friends got pregnant. Basically he entered, she changed her mind and said no. He withdrew and that was that. He was real nice about it and they're still friends However, no condom was used and she ended up with a baby girl from that brief encounter. (turns out he's gay. He was trying not to be for along time, but when he heard she was pregnant, he came out. All are the better for it.)

:o


Ya, I know, it was all a bit Jerry Springer. LOL :)

_________________
"The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose."
~~Hada Bejar


Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:50 pm
Profile WWW
Marquis/Marquise
Marquis/Marquise
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:21 am
Posts: 77
Location: USA
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Andre Castelot states clearly with sources that it was indeed a condition of phimosis which means the foreskin cannot be drawn painlessly back across the penis; the operation was indeed performed after Joseph's visit with obvious success. Prior to that Joseph writes his mother the Empress a very descriptive paragraph of the problem from LXVI's view. As the couple had no sex education and were shy and immature to boot they practiced what they thought was a complete sex act which took frank talks from Emperor Joseph to get them going in the right direction.

Phimosis is I believe common and handled by circumsion; a procedure slightly less involved than circumsion could correct it and I have no doubt that Louis rode to the hounds almost immediately although perhaps in a carriage rather than a saddle. :angel3:

Castelot's book has indexes and a bibliography--I really don't read much else and therefore believe I present accurate material. Thank you for hanging in here with me on this essay.


Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:56 am
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:35 am
Posts: 1064
Location: Australia
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Pimprenelle wrote:
The problem with the phimosis story is that no operation record was found. On the contrary, Louis' hunting diary shows no interruption. That means, in my opinion, that there was no operation. So, was this phimosis cured "naturally" ?

Let's add that no doctor actually reports about this phimosis. They all confirm that the young man is perfectly healthy and ready for work !

So... what ?

When Marie Antoinette arrived at Versailles, she was but a girl, she looked 12 and had not her periods yet. No, her monthly cycle was not fixed yet. This could indeed explain a "narrowness of passage".

If her husband was extremely developed sexually, these physical disproportions could cause great pains to both partners. That is Bertiere's development, and she adds that, being repeated often and often, this difficult experience soon became a terrible moment for each of them.

This could also explain why the consummation took so long. This experience having grown more and more terrible each day, both Louis and Antoinette tried to avoid the alcove the most they could. Untill Joseph came and talked to her sister, reminding her of her duties.

_________________
“Love is the emblem of eternity: it confounds all notion of time: effaces all memory of a beginning, all fear of an end.”
- Germaine de Staël


Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:10 am
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Posts: 1981
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
I have read in Vincent Cronin's Louis and Antoinette that the marriage was indeed consummated in 1773. But there was no pregnancy until 1777 or 1778. Here is a translated part of a letter that Marie Antoinette wrote to her mother in August 1773. I did not translate it, though I got help from an online translator. Shame on me! ;)

Here is the part of the letter. I am quite sure that this is indeed a statement about the consummation.

“Two days having written you we believed M. Dauphin and me to have to say our state to the king. It set ablaze me with a lot of cordiality by calling me his dear daughter.”


Marie Antoinette, August 13th, 1773.

_________________
"Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown."-William Shakespeare


Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:19 pm
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Posts: 1981
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
I intend on typing and "translating" the letter in it's entirety later.

_________________
"Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown."-William Shakespeare


Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:21 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:04 pm
Posts: 2266
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Hellou_Librorum wrote:
I have read in Vincent Cronin's Louis and Antoinette that the marriage was indeed consummated in 1773. But there was no pregnancy until 1777 or 1778. Here is a translated part of a letter that Marie Antoinette wrote to her mother in August 1773. I did not translate it, though I got help from an online translator. Shame on me! ;)

Here is the part of the letter. I am quite sure that this is indeed a statement about the consummation.

“Two days having written you we believed M. Dauphin and me to have to say our state to the king. It set ablaze me with a lot of cordiality by calling me his dear daughter.”


Marie Antoinette, August 13th, 1773.


Yes,Hellou_Librorum, they were really trying in 1773 to consummate the marriage and may have come close to succeeding but (as Pimprenelle says above) it was a painful process. I am so glad you mentioned the Cronin book. Because of the physical impediments total penetration was probably not completed until 1778. Indeed the story of the phimosis has no basis, and neither do the claims by some that Louis was impotent. He was not.

_________________
I forgive all my enemies the harm they have done me.


Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:53 pm
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Posts: 1981
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
I thought Louis XVI did indeed penetrate but not long enough for a pregnancy.

_________________
"Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown."-William Shakespeare


Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:39 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:04 pm
Posts: 2266
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Hellou_Librorum wrote:
I thought Louis XVI did indeed penetrate but not long enough for a pregnancy.
Yes, that's pretty much it. :shock:

_________________
I forgive all my enemies the harm they have done me.


Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:47 pm
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:45 pm
Posts: 944
Location: Hungary
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Hellou_Librorum wrote:
I thought Louis XVI did indeed penetrate but not long enough for a pregnancy.


I also thought this but I was never enough brave to ask on this topic... omg :roll:
So, thanks Hellou for revealing this...

_________________
"Ceux qui n'ont pas vécu avant 1789, ne connaissent pas la douceur de vivre" Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord


Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:54 pm
Profile
Marquis/Marquise
Marquis/Marquise
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:21 am
Posts: 77
Location: USA
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
I love this forum and all its topics and many of your very educated comments and explanations. I do find it odd that I often cite sources for material which I add to the forum hoping to contribute something interesting--often my comments are overlooked--evoking no response. what gives? I've been on here several months now but in spite of being relatively new I contribute. :help:


Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:08 am
Profile
Royalty
Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:35 am
Posts: 1064
Location: Australia
Post Re: One theory about their conjugal visits
Honestly, I wouldn't take it personally, winsan2. Not as many people regularly contribute to this forum anymore. I don't think that just because no one replies much means they don't like your contributions.

_________________
“Love is the emblem of eternity: it confounds all notion of time: effaces all memory of a beginning, all fear of an end.”
- Germaine de Staël


Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:59 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.