Marie Antoinette Online
  • FORUM
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:13 pm



Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next
 What was this 'petit' operation'? 
Author Message
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post What was this 'petit' operation'?
I often wondered when younger what on earth the 'petit operation' that Louis underwent in order to be able to consummate his marriage actually WAS - most books I have read about the couple are rather coy on the subject, or at least presume that readers will know without being told what is being referred. I can only presume that it was circumsion... am I correct?


Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:43 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
This operation is not sure for all the historians….Louis XVI had a phymosis, but nobody knows if he was really operated… :?

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:02 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
A phymosis? *hops off to google*. So it wasn't something as simple as an overtight foreskin which could be correct by circumsion? (btw I hope that this topic is appropriate for this forum .. I will remove it if not :)).


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:10 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
Yes a phymosis can be looked like that indeed! But nothing proves that Louis XVI was operated… :wink:

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
Oh I didn't know that -I thought it was documented that he was operated. Is it just speculated then?


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:17 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
Certain witnesses say that he was operated, as those of the clan Marie-Antoinette who absolutely wanted to defer the fault of this not consumed marriage on Louis XVI, but other witnesses say the opposite….who says the truth? We do not know… :?

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:34 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
In the book that I am reading, which admittedly is written by someone who usually writes romantic historical fiction, it quotes correspondence between Marie Antoinette and her mother and brother on the subject .. is this not legitimate?


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:53 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
Yes indeed Marie-Thérèse and Joseph II gave councils to Marie-Antoinette to consume their marriage, they exchanged letters, and Joseph II even spoke about it directly with her at the time of his visit in Versailles. But nothing proves this operation…

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 2040
Post 
Indeed, since the marriage was not consummated for 7 years, people suggested that an operation could be necessary to cure Louis' phimosis. But it actually were suppositions...

Antoinette and Marie Therese talked about it in their correspondence, it is true. But there were but rumors and suggestions. There are no actual reports of any operation made by any surgeon.

On the contrary, Louis' diary shows no interruption in his huntings, while this operation would require several days convalescence at least.

Furthermore, there are doctors' reports and Antoinette's letters confirming that Louis was examined and that they found nothing wrong with him.

_________________
te voir encore me rappelle à la vie


Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:02 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
Interesting I hadn't realised that the operation was not definitely known to have been carried out. However is it likely that such a condition would have reversed itself spontaenously?


Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:47 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
Quote:
However is it likely that such a condition would have reversed itself spontaenously?


If the handicaps was not very serious yes it is possible…and I think it was a little problem. And this little physqic problem exaggerated by contemporaries was not the only reason of this not consumed marriage … Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette was timid and did not have big individual pleasures with the sexual relations… But with time, they could do it naturally :D

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:54 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
Interesting - that's rather different than some of the reports of the situation I have read and just goes to show that you can't always know what the truth of a matter is :).


Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:54 pm
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Posts: 1532
Location: France
Post 
Indeed Moose, therefore it is preferable to read several books written by different historians or witnesses, because we discover various testimonys and possible versions… and there are much of it!
And thus we can sort the right and the bad information, with a personal and legitimates interpretation too :D

_________________
Quelle grandeur!


Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:16 pm
Profile WWW
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:04 pm
Posts: 2266
Post 
There is no evidence that Louis XVI had a phimosis. It was never mentioned in the medical reports of his examinations and such a defect would have been considered of great import in one destined to beget heirs for France. He went hunting everyday when the alleged operation was supposed to have happened, which would have been difficult. There were other medical procedures that may have been discussed, other than circumcism, that would help the young couple consummate their marriage, but I don't think any were actually performed.

_________________
I forgive all my enemies the harm they have done me.


Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:52 am
Profile
Prince/Princesse
Prince/Princesse

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 376
Post 
I see.. though it would be unusual for a marriage to be unconsummated for seven years in a 'normal' couple I would think, even though they were young when they married..


Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:03 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 161 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.